tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post115224684238543362..comments2023-10-16T02:46:52.844-07:00Comments on palosverdesblog: Happy Birthday Mr. PresidentBill Lamahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02092428206818183253noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152382361340327322006-07-08T11:12:00.000-07:002006-07-08T11:12:00.000-07:00Why is it Bush supporters to a much larger degree ...Why is it Bush supporters to a much larger degree than Bush bashers make it all so superficially personal? Bush is fine Christian man. Bush has a sense of humor(?). Bush is a role model for my son. Bush has a square jaw. Bush looks good on a mountain bike. And on and on. <BR/><BR/>The lack of substance in these “defenses” of the man drives many moderates and left leaning Democrats over the edge into mindless (though often very amusing) bashing. But there is plenty of room left on blogs and in print to carefully examine the evidence from Bush’s six years in office. Now the old Reagan question can fairly be asked of Bush and his gang: Are you and the country better off now than you were six years ago? Answer that one candidly, recognizing that the party in power deserves more than half the blame for the dismal picture that confronts this nation, and you are on your way to an important close inspection of how we got where we are and who is responsible.<BR/><BR/>I would venture that most Bush supporters know the record of their leader’s policies, foreign and domestic, are shot through with miscalculations in planning and missteps in execution. But to remain supporters they have no where to go but to hide behind what they see as the human qualities of the man. Many do this to cover their own guilt and misreading of the man they had such high hopes for, the man they personally bought into with big money and deep emotions--all with flags flying and bumper stickers prominently displayed. And a few do it for more easily calculated reasons. For them the Bush Years have been good years for the wealthy. But all rationalize and fool themselves into thinking their support is some kind of exalted “loyalty” and steadfast “patriotism.” <BR/><BR/>Bush’s human qualities are not worth debating or bashing at this point in his presidency. His record and what this has meant for the country is where the debate should go.gary dailyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06649278809690706179noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152377710819013572006-07-08T09:55:00.000-07:002006-07-08T09:55:00.000-07:00Dear Decider definitely brought back dignity and a...Dear Decider definitely brought back dignity and a sense of gravitas to his job:<BR/><BR/>President Bush: Peter. Are you going to ask that question with shades on?<BR/>Peter Wallsten of the Los Angeles Times: I can take them off.<BR/>Bush: I'm interested in the shade look, seriously.<BR/>Wallsten: All right, I'll keep it, then.<BR/>Bush: For the viewers, there's no sun.<BR/>Wallsten: I guess it depends on your perspective.<BR/>Bush: Touché.<BR/><BR/>—Exchange with legally blind reporter Peter Wallsten, to whom Bush later apologized, Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006<BR/><BR/>"That's called, 'A Charge To Keep,' based upon a religious hymn. The hymn talks about serving God. The president's job is never to promote a religion."—Showing German newspaper reporter Kai Diekmann the Oval Office, Washington, D.C., May 5, 2006<BR/><BR/>Long live Dear Decider!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152375272136112342006-07-08T09:14:00.000-07:002006-07-08T09:14:00.000-07:00President Bush has always risen above the crowd wi...President Bush has always risen above the crowd with his graciousness and kind & sometimes funny words even to those who say the most awful things about him. (although he's been giving the press a run for their money lately). He brought dignity back to the Office of the President. That's something I admire and respect.<BR/><BR/>With regard to his politics...well, I agree with most of his agenda and the rest I "agree to disagree."<BR/><BR/>Happy birthday Mr. President!<BR/><BR/>Dori M.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152304940898867382006-07-07T13:42:00.000-07:002006-07-07T13:42:00.000-07:00Happy Birthday to our honorable president. Many m...Happy Birthday to our honorable president. Many many more!<BR/><BR/>~CarolynneAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152299300469496652006-07-07T12:08:00.000-07:002006-07-07T12:08:00.000-07:00We praise Dear Decider for his wondrous works for ...We praise Dear Decider for his wondrous works for humanity. Dear Leader Bush has our utmost respect and gratitude. We wish Him all of the best on his 60th birthday, and wish for Constitutional change so he can stay in office for many more decades to come. May those who illegally criticize Dear Decider be rounded up and sent to prison camps in Northern Alaska. May the press be shut down if they dare reveal the inner secrets of our Beloved Leader's government. May we be victorious in our Crusade against the Mohammedeans, and reclaim the fossil fuels which our rightly ours, according the Scriptures.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152297519961778392006-07-07T11:38:00.000-07:002006-07-07T11:38:00.000-07:00YUK, PASS THE VOMIT BUCKET.VicYUK, PASS THE VOMIT BUCKET.<BR/><BR/>VicAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152295773633775972006-07-07T11:09:00.000-07:002006-07-07T11:09:00.000-07:00Bill I feel the same way about our President, a ma...Bill I feel the same way about our President, a man of principles, core values and goodness. My husband and I respect and support him.Happy 60th birthday Mr.President! We love you.<BR/><BR/>Thank you, Bill.<BR/><BR/>HayaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152295645953535932006-07-07T11:07:00.000-07:002006-07-07T11:07:00.000-07:00It occurred to me that I refer to my closest frien...It occurred to me that I refer to my closest friends as “Brother” – it used to be that only my Marine buddies were my Brothers (or Sister, as the case may be), but over time I’ve started using the term of honor and endearment for close fiends and people who I honor and respect. So, having said that, assuming you don’t mind:<BR/><BR/>Brother Bill – This piece reminded me of someone. I don’t know if I ever told you about my ex-friend Jeanne. Jeanne is a commercial real estate broker who lives in Pacific Palisades. Although new friends, we shared many interests, including running, hiking and racquetball. One day politics finally came up in the course of normal conversation, and Jeanne stated to me that she loathed President Bush so much that the very sight of his photograph made her physically ill. I replied that although I had loathed bill clinton (and in point of fact still do), when he was my Commander in Chief I showed him respect and honored the office that he held, and that it was not just a shame, but a sin that liberals and democrats like her hated George Bush so much that they were willing to degrade the best interests of our great nation to score political points against him and/or to try to do whatever they can to have his policies fail, even when those policies were sound, again, just to “get at” George Bush. I reminded her that the Republican Congress gave bill clinton Supreme Court Justice Ginsberg; arguably the most liberal justice of all time, while democrats have fought President Bush for every appointment he’s tried to make, even among candidates only mildly right of center. I ended the conversation by saying that while I enjoy diversity and honest disagreement and dialog as much as anyone, people with a mind set like that, including her, are borderline treasonists and are not welcome in my company. Never saw her or spoke with her again.<BR/><BR/>What is it about these people that they can put America’s best interests aside – in fact put the best interests of freedom-loving people across the globe aside, just for their petty politics.<BR/><BR/>Semper Fidelis.<BR/><BR/>Dave.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152282897095732392006-07-07T07:34:00.000-07:002006-07-07T07:34:00.000-07:00The big 6-0 for W. A good time to evaluate yourse...The big 6-0 for W. A good time to evaluate yourself Bush II, others are.<BR/><BR/>Historian Robert S. McElvaine puts it this way:<BR/><BR/>“My assessment is that George W. Bush’s record on running up debt to burden our children is the worst since Ronald Reagan; his record on government surveillance of citizens is the worst since Richard Nixon; his record on foreign-military policy has gotten us into the worst foreign mess we’ve been in since Lyndon Johnson sank us into Vietnam; his economic record is the worst since Herbert Hoover; his record of tax favoritism for the rich is the worst since Calvin Coolidge; his record of trampling on civil liberties is the worst since Woodrow Wilson.”<BR/><BR/>[Please note, McElvaine’s comparisons include Democrats along with the usual obvious past cases of Republican malfeasance and ineptitude in office.] <BR/><BR/>And here is the distinguished political scientist Alan Wolfe on W’s damage to the honorable and necessary political philosophy of conservatism: <BR/><BR/>“. . . on the right as vehemently as on the left, the verdict has been rolling in: This administration, if not the worst in American history, will soon find itself in the final four. Even those who appeal to history's ultimate judgment halfheartedly acknowledge as much. One seeks tomorrow's vindication only in the context of today's dismal performance. . . .<BR/><BR/>“Eager to salvage conservatism from the wreckage of conservative rule, right-wing pundits are furiously blaming right-wing politicians for failing to adhere to right-wing convictions. Libertarians such as Bruce Bartlett fret that under Republican control, government has not shrunk, as conservatives prescribe, but has grown. Insiders like Peggy Noonan complain that Republicans have become--well, insiders; they are too focused on retaining power and too disconnected from the base whose anger pushed them into power. Idealistic younger conservatives bewail the care and feeding of the K Street beast. Paleocons Pat Buchanan and Robert Novak blame neocons William Kristol and Charles Krauthammer for the debacle that is Iraq. Through all these laments there pulsates a sense of desperation: A conservative president and an even more conservative Congress must be repudiated to enable genuine conservatism to survive.”<BR/><BR/>[This is all starting to sound like the Democrats scratching at each other in 1972.]<BR/><BR/>Let’s face it, W looks good on a road bike, but his intellectual, administrative and oratorical short comings have run this country into a ditch.gary dailyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06649278809690706179noreply@blogger.com