tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post115248284708886776..comments2023-10-16T02:46:52.844-07:00Comments on palosverdesblog: Bad IdeasBill Lamahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02092428206818183253noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152546227700249142006-07-10T08:43:00.000-07:002006-07-10T08:43:00.000-07:00http://tinyurl.com/fd86fhttp://tinyurl.com/fd86fAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152541532082166122006-07-10T07:25:00.000-07:002006-07-10T07:25:00.000-07:00Bill,Definitely feel like I understand the liberal...Bill,<BR/>Definitely feel like I understand the liberal global warming. Great post!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152505113661468162006-07-09T21:18:00.000-07:002006-07-09T21:18:00.000-07:00Bill reports:“The hockey stick figure above shows ...Bill reports:<BR/><BR/>“The hockey stick figure above shows the model projections from the IPCC report, ranging from an increase of 1.4 deg. C up to 5.8 deg. C by 2100. It is interesting that the calculation from the US National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) based on the most sophisticated model predicts only 1.1 deg. C but was excluded from the report.”<BR/><BR/>But the National Center for Atmospheric Research web site at: <BR/>http://www.ucar.edu/research/climate/future.shtml<BR/><BR/>reports this!<BR/><BR/>“Many NCAR scientists are part of a global team studying this problem and its meaning for our planet's future. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change includes more than 1,000 experts from a variety of climate specialties. In their most recent report (2001), the IPCC predicted that increasing levels of greenhouse gases will warm the globe by a significant amount. The most probable range, according to the IPCC, is between 2.5 and 10.5 degrees F (1.4–5.8 degrees C) over 1990 levels by the year 2100. Also in 2001, an NCAR scientist and his colleague estimated a 90% likelihood that the range will fall between 3 and 9degrees F (1.7–4.9 degrees C).”<BR/><BR/>So, what’s going on? Which NCAR report should we follow? The one Bill reports as "excluded" or the one posted on the NCAR web site?gary dailyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06649278809690706179noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152503739047825602006-07-09T20:55:00.000-07:002006-07-09T20:55:00.000-07:00Hey Bill...the last 2 posts of yours do not reflec...Hey Bill...the last 2 posts of yours do not reflect my area of knowledge by any means BUT interestingly I could grasp much of what you are saying. Your explanations are 'relatively' easy to understand. Thanks Prof!<BR/><BR/>Dori M.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152501792573657032006-07-09T20:23:00.000-07:002006-07-09T20:23:00.000-07:00Bill, if you even think for a second that most of ...Bill, if you even think for a second that most of the dimwits in here will even bother to read a fraction of what you wrote, you're wrong. Are you preaching to the choir or are you really trying to change minds? If your purpose is the latter, you will fail miserably every time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-1152501412971771992006-07-09T20:16:00.000-07:002006-07-09T20:16:00.000-07:00Nice post BillNice post BillAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com