tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post8302915724714061016..comments2023-10-16T02:46:52.844-07:00Comments on palosverdesblog: Revolutions in PhysicsBill Lamahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02092428206818183253noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-20803379920222241532007-01-29T22:39:00.000-08:002007-01-29T22:39:00.000-08:00Yeah, MWT is treated by most serious physicists, a...Yeah, MWT is treated by most serious physicists, as a joke, and by a few more decent physicists as pointing to the possibility of unrealized possibilities. I think it's crazy. <br /> <br />So it's a pretty far-fetched and desperate comparative standard to try and use to validate superstition, no matter how popular that superstition may be. If Martin was objectively contemplating, instead of supportively contriving, he would from the same population of ideas found something like the following more compelling, even if it was less satisfying.<br /> <br /> <br />“Surely the conjecture that there is just one EVOLVING universe AT A TIME is infinitely simpler and easier to believe than that a Creator capable of creating countless billions upon billions of worlds, constantly increasing in number, was himself created by nobody."<br /> <br />PhilAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9999692.post-24436166682140766232007-01-29T22:37:00.000-08:002007-01-29T22:37:00.000-08:00To this:
"Relativists claimed that Einstein's the...To this: <br />"Relativists claimed that Einstein's theory showed that culture and morality are relative, i.e., dependent on one's perspective. It is too bad that Einstein did not choose a title such as the theory of Invariance rather than Relativity."<br /> <br />I have only one reply. If it had been called Invariance rather than Relativity in order to be idiot-proof, I'm certain a more creative idiot would have figured out a way to use it to justify his own behavior with relative-ethics. <br /> <br />Thanks for all, <br />GingerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com